نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشیار دانشگاه تبریز
2 کارشناسی ارشد تاریخ ایران دوره اسلامی دانشگاه تبریز
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
In one look at the general historical works of early Islamic centuries, meaning works that has been written in the second half of the third century to the first half of fifth century, the point that is looked, it is the point of beginning and onset in this histories. Thus general histories that contained in the first temporal scope such as Tarikh-i Dinawari, Tarikh-I Yaqubi and Tarikh-I Tabari begin their histories with anecdote of story of creation of Adam as the first man interpretation of Quran, and related works for second temporal time, the histories such as Tajarib al-umam, Tarikh-I Thaalabi and Tarikh-I Gardizi begin anecdote of history with story of the first Iranian legend kings and monarchs according to anecdots of Iranian khodaynameh. In this manner for the find of causes of this matter, meaning why historians difference of style and preference in the beginning point of their histories, in the course of doing of one comparative study in the middle of this works and with investigation qualities and historic works of this histotians in two separate debates by method of analitic, we get at a conclusion that the historian of the early time because of that they had religious view and taken of Islam religion principles and with the end of operation of history in help of religion and tradition, begin their histories to use Islamic and religious anecdots. But latter time historians that they had secular and pragmatic view to the history and with the end of his operation for politic thinks and practices, begin their histories with stories Iranian primary kings and monarchs.
کلیدواژهها [English]
کتابها
مقالهها
)